When we become that which we oppose, we loose. We loose when we respond to:
1. Hate with hate.
2. Abuse with abuse.
3. Violence with violence (not precluding reasonable force to restrain).
4. Lies with lies.
5. Slander with slander.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
The Truth Will Set You Free
"And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32).
I had a mate at Richmond in the mid 70s that had married a girl from Sri Lanka or another former British colony in that part of the world. At school she had been taught about the terrorists in her country. Following independence school children were taught about these same people - except that they had become freedom fighters.
There are always two sides of history - that of the victor and that of the vanquished. That of our political masters and that of the other peoples political masters.
I had a mate at Richmond in the mid 70s that had married a girl from Sri Lanka or another former British colony in that part of the world. At school she had been taught about the terrorists in her country. Following independence school children were taught about these same people - except that they had become freedom fighters.
There are always two sides of history - that of the victor and that of the vanquished. That of our political masters and that of the other peoples political masters.
We in the west are not taught the same history as those in the Middle
East. From our perspective the Crusaders were defending the holy land
from the infidel. From the Moslem perspective it was the Moslems
defending the holy land from the infidel. I remember as a kid watching a
TV show about Richard the Lion Hearted and his noble conquests on the
crusades.
We know the history of the holocaust and the settlement of the modern state of Israel as a safe haven for Jews. Moslems can tell us every act of terrorism carried out by the Zionists as they displaced the Palestinians.
Arabs and Persians (Iranians), and the various tribes of each, have hated each others guts for centuries. But all these tribes also know the history of Western interference and betrayal and it is this hatred of the West that can unite them.
A mate of mine spend a few years working in Dubai. He was told one day by one of his Arab mates that if it was not for Israel the Arabs would be tearing each other apart.
Its not only the Middle East that has long memories. A Catholic mate of mine and his brother were hitch hiking through the Republic of Ireland some years back when they were given a lift by the local Protestant minister.
'What's your name?'
'Fitzgerald'
'You Fitzgeralds! Your great-great-great ... grandfather ...'
Also a long memory that saw decades of violence.
So what am I trying to say?
Perhaps if we in the West were to be honest with our history, to admit to the historical wrongs our side have done, and to try and avoid those same mistakes in the future, we might begin to diffuse some of the anger on the other side. And if we did that perhaps we could give ISIS and their ilk less ammunition to play with in their appeals to the Arab/Iranian world.
We know the history of the holocaust and the settlement of the modern state of Israel as a safe haven for Jews. Moslems can tell us every act of terrorism carried out by the Zionists as they displaced the Palestinians.
Arabs and Persians (Iranians), and the various tribes of each, have hated each others guts for centuries. But all these tribes also know the history of Western interference and betrayal and it is this hatred of the West that can unite them.
A mate of mine spend a few years working in Dubai. He was told one day by one of his Arab mates that if it was not for Israel the Arabs would be tearing each other apart.
Its not only the Middle East that has long memories. A Catholic mate of mine and his brother were hitch hiking through the Republic of Ireland some years back when they were given a lift by the local Protestant minister.
'What's your name?'
'Fitzgerald'
'You Fitzgeralds! Your great-great-great ... grandfather ...'
Also a long memory that saw decades of violence.
So what am I trying to say?
Perhaps if we in the West were to be honest with our history, to admit to the historical wrongs our side have done, and to try and avoid those same mistakes in the future, we might begin to diffuse some of the anger on the other side. And if we did that perhaps we could give ISIS and their ilk less ammunition to play with in their appeals to the Arab/Iranian world.
Reformation and Islam
The Church of the Middle Ages was no better than the Islamic State of
today. Heretics were tortured on the rack, burnt at the stake, and
hunted down by the Church. It has been said that the Waldensian Valleys
ran red with the blood of the martyrs - those who refused to bow to the
bishop of Rome.
Crusaders were sent to the Holy Land to fight the Infidel on the promise that if they died on the crusade they would go straight to Paradise, bypassing Purgatory. Sound familiar?
The Church controlled the universities and the educated used their authority to reinforce the doctrines and corrupt practices of the Church to protect their own vested interest. The Bible was printed in Latin and interpreted by the Priests in harmony with the decrees of the Bishop of Rome. Those who challenged the authority were given the choice of recantation or excommunication - or worse. I suggest some similarities to the fundamentalist mullahs of today.
Crusaders were sent to the Holy Land to fight the Infidel on the promise that if they died on the crusade they would go straight to Paradise, bypassing Purgatory. Sound familiar?
The Church controlled the universities and the educated used their authority to reinforce the doctrines and corrupt practices of the Church to protect their own vested interest. The Bible was printed in Latin and interpreted by the Priests in harmony with the decrees of the Bishop of Rome. Those who challenged the authority were given the choice of recantation or excommunication - or worse. I suggest some similarities to the fundamentalist mullahs of today.
There were, however, courageous men and women who gave the people the
Bible in their own language, who challenged the authority of the Church,
and encouraged people to interpret the Bible for themselves.
The Protestant Reformation and the accompanying Renaissance liberated Europe and broke the power of the Church in those lands that embraced the Reformation. And that gives us hope.
Taliban and IS hate education, unless of course the educated are those that back their cause. The last thing they want is for people to think for themselves, hence the attack on schools and women who want an education.
Some Moslems will always buy into the hate doctrine, and some people will always seek to use education for evil. But history tells us that education liberates. It took centuries to beat the Medieval Church, so we should not expect IS and their ilk to be defeated over night. But, with proper support, I believe we can encourage educated Moslems around the world to challenge the crazed, especially where they have begun to enjoy the freedom of the West and can make comparisons with life 'back home'.
The Protestant Reformation and the accompanying Renaissance liberated Europe and broke the power of the Church in those lands that embraced the Reformation. And that gives us hope.
Taliban and IS hate education, unless of course the educated are those that back their cause. The last thing they want is for people to think for themselves, hence the attack on schools and women who want an education.
Some Moslems will always buy into the hate doctrine, and some people will always seek to use education for evil. But history tells us that education liberates. It took centuries to beat the Medieval Church, so we should not expect IS and their ilk to be defeated over night. But, with proper support, I believe we can encourage educated Moslems around the world to challenge the crazed, especially where they have begun to enjoy the freedom of the West and can make comparisons with life 'back home'.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Modern Australia - mate, we've come a long way
Australia.
Ok, we're not perfect and have a few skeletons in the cupboard. But
compared to a lot of other places we have done pretty good.
White Australia started out as a dumping ground for convicts and then became a land of hope for people who had no future in the UK. Our forebears worked hard to build a decent future for their kids.
They pulled together through famine, flood, fire, depression and war.
We talk of Aussie values - standing by your mates, sticking up for the underdog, giving a bloke a fair go. That's where we came from.
And, as we developed we began to do things for the next generation - universities, health care, education, and a social welfare net to look after those who had somehow fallen through the cracks through no fault of their own.
But somehow its all gone wrong. Now those government support systems that were meant to look after the battler, those down on their luck, or to give someone a hand up are seen as entitlements without obligations. No need to work, no need to go without, just squeal about entitlements, especially if it looks like they might be reduced or you might have to do something for them.
We are fast becoming a two tiered society - those who have and those who have not. Pull together - stand by your mate. What does that mean? The underdog - kick him in the guts while he's down.
Modern Australia - mate, we've come a long way.
White Australia started out as a dumping ground for convicts and then became a land of hope for people who had no future in the UK. Our forebears worked hard to build a decent future for their kids.
They pulled together through famine, flood, fire, depression and war.
We talk of Aussie values - standing by your mates, sticking up for the underdog, giving a bloke a fair go. That's where we came from.
And, as we developed we began to do things for the next generation - universities, health care, education, and a social welfare net to look after those who had somehow fallen through the cracks through no fault of their own.
But somehow its all gone wrong. Now those government support systems that were meant to look after the battler, those down on their luck, or to give someone a hand up are seen as entitlements without obligations. No need to work, no need to go without, just squeal about entitlements, especially if it looks like they might be reduced or you might have to do something for them.
We are fast becoming a two tiered society - those who have and those who have not. Pull together - stand by your mate. What does that mean? The underdog - kick him in the guts while he's down.
Modern Australia - mate, we've come a long way.
Monday, September 29, 2014
Its all in the interpretation
Whether it be the Bible, Koran, or any other religious text, what it
says is not as important as how the reader interprets it. How the
reader interprets the text is dependent on the cultural influences that
have formed the reader's paradigm, or world view. Our brains readily
absorb data that is consistent with our paradigms. Data that does not
fit may not be acknowledged or, if it does, will be quickly dismissed.
Then we come to those who may lack the education that enables them to read, or interpret, for themselves. We all have our authority figures, whether they be priests, imans, doctors of theology, politicians or football coaches. Then it will be their interpretation that counts, not the text itself.
Then we come to those who may lack the education that enables them to read, or interpret, for themselves. We all have our authority figures, whether they be priests, imans, doctors of theology, politicians or football coaches. Then it will be their interpretation that counts, not the text itself.
I will never presume to tell others what the Koran says or how it
should be interpreted. I have seen interpretations of the Bible that I
believe just do not add up, and I am offended when others who hold these
interpretations tell what I should believe because of their
interpretation.
Rather than focus on those things that divide, I will continue to try and find common ground and build better understandings from that starting point. People of good will must join together to defeat this world's evils, including Islamic State.
Rather than focus on those things that divide, I will continue to try and find common ground and build better understandings from that starting point. People of good will must join together to defeat this world's evils, including Islamic State.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
On Immigration, Asylum Seekers and Things
In discussions regarding immigration and Australia’s
treatment of refugees, asylum seekers, boat people, illegal arrivals, or
whatever else may come within that broad parameter of things, there is one
fundamental thing that must always be understood – the world, and life, is not
fair.
Is it fair that people should be forced to flee their homes
because of persecution, war, drought and the like? Of course not. And is it
fair that such people should languish in detention centres, refugee camps etc?
No. And is it fair that a rich country like people should turn people away? Of
course not.
But – life is not fair.
Second thing that we should insist on. The first priority of
the Australian Parliament and all our elected representatives is to protect the
unity of the Australian nation. If there is a risk that uncontrolled or knee
jerk policies result in the breakdown of social cohesion we run the risk of
creating the type of society that others are fleeing from. Rather than solving
one problem we have created another.
Fact. Many of these asylum seekers come from cultures that
have values that we find abhorrent. They have different understanding of how
society should be regulated. Their treatment of women, for example, is not in
keeping with our values of equality. Arranged marriages, child marriages,
honour killings etc. Not to mention centuries of hostility between one group
and another.
Some may label our attitudes as racist. There are things
that get around on Facebook and social media that are, I believe, ill-informed,
especially when it comes to the amount of money these people receive after they
arrive. But there is also, I believe, a legitimate fear among many about the
impact that immigration from some of these countries may bring.
While our politicians may play to those fears for political
advantage – and I believe there is no doubt they do – that does not mean those
fears are groundless.
I am all for giving people a fresh start. And that extends
to people from any country, culture or religion. But we need to do it in ways
that preserves our freedoms, that allows our citizens to travel without fear to
any part of the country. And the only way we can do that is manage the change
carefully.
And if that means we let people suffer in refugee camps and
the like – remember, life sucks.
Its not about compassion, its about reality. Refugees are more than people on boats. There are millions of Palestinian refugees in the world, many of them on the Gaza strip and West Bank. Some still have the keys to the houses their parents or grandparents were forced out of in the late 40s. Palestinian refugee kids with stones fight highly trained soldiers in tanks.
This is only a small part of the total number of displaced persons around the globe. Yes - life sucks.
People on boats get all the attention. Is compassion selective - only directed at those who can afford to pay people smugglers? A refugee camp on Mannus Island or Naru may not be paradise, but if managed properly it should give people a basic safety, nutrition and health care - which is more than a lost of other displaced persons in this world get. And they are not going to get run over by Israeli tanks of have their houses bulldozed because one of the family is suspected of being a terrorist. Not an ideal solution, but better than where they were. Done properly, it is a measure of compassion.
If there is a solution it has to be a world solution, because Australia can't be the solution.
And if unmanaged immigration means my granddaughters end up being treated as second class citizens, denined the rights to which I believe they are entitled, and cannot walk any street in this country in safety because we have been 'compassionate', then I am not inclined to be compassionate. But then, I don't equate compassion with opening our doors to anyone who rocks up in a boat, or who steps off an aeroplane, and says 'I am a refugee.'
Its not about compassion, its about reality. Refugees are more than people on boats. There are millions of Palestinian refugees in the world, many of them on the Gaza strip and West Bank. Some still have the keys to the houses their parents or grandparents were forced out of in the late 40s. Palestinian refugee kids with stones fight highly trained soldiers in tanks.
This is only a small part of the total number of displaced persons around the globe. Yes - life sucks.
People on boats get all the attention. Is compassion selective - only directed at those who can afford to pay people smugglers? A refugee camp on Mannus Island or Naru may not be paradise, but if managed properly it should give people a basic safety, nutrition and health care - which is more than a lost of other displaced persons in this world get. And they are not going to get run over by Israeli tanks of have their houses bulldozed because one of the family is suspected of being a terrorist. Not an ideal solution, but better than where they were. Done properly, it is a measure of compassion.
If there is a solution it has to be a world solution, because Australia can't be the solution.
And if unmanaged immigration means my granddaughters end up being treated as second class citizens, denined the rights to which I believe they are entitled, and cannot walk any street in this country in safety because we have been 'compassionate', then I am not inclined to be compassionate. But then, I don't equate compassion with opening our doors to anyone who rocks up in a boat, or who steps off an aeroplane, and says 'I am a refugee.'
Thursday, June 12, 2014
The Aussie Bastard
One
thing that intrigues me about our Australian culture is this - we can
call someone a bastard and they'll turn around and buy us a beer. In
most, if not the rest of the world a broken nose is probably a good
outcome - many places we'd have our throat cut. Why?
While I have never been able to find anything to confirm my theory, I suspect it goes back to the First Fleet. If my memory is correct, there were 11 ships, one carried women. The women were there for one reason, and one reason only - the authorites in England believed there would be riots if there was no female company.
Unlike the Americans, whose first white settlers gave thanks to God for their new land when they first embarked, our forbears rolled out the keg and had a good old fashioned drunken orgy. The first white bastard concieved on our shores was probably conceived that night. And perhaps that's why we are so relaxed about the term. In our early days we may well have been a pack of bastards.
Now one would think that given the differences in our orgins - Australian and American - that America had the more enlightened origin and we would therefore expect that they would have developed a more enlightened society. Yet, from where I sit, I see us as having developed a more cohesive, fairer place to live and it concerns me now that we seem to be going down a different road.
If someone can correct my understanding of our history, please feel free to do so.
While I have never been able to find anything to confirm my theory, I suspect it goes back to the First Fleet. If my memory is correct, there were 11 ships, one carried women. The women were there for one reason, and one reason only - the authorites in England believed there would be riots if there was no female company.
Unlike the Americans, whose first white settlers gave thanks to God for their new land when they first embarked, our forbears rolled out the keg and had a good old fashioned drunken orgy. The first white bastard concieved on our shores was probably conceived that night. And perhaps that's why we are so relaxed about the term. In our early days we may well have been a pack of bastards.
Now one would think that given the differences in our orgins - Australian and American - that America had the more enlightened origin and we would therefore expect that they would have developed a more enlightened society. Yet, from where I sit, I see us as having developed a more cohesive, fairer place to live and it concerns me now that we seem to be going down a different road.
If someone can correct my understanding of our history, please feel free to do so.
Friday, June 6, 2014
Is marriage equality irrational
There is something I see as irrational in the debate over so-called
marriage equality. Now if I were gay, Christian, and believed that gay
marriage were consistent with my faith, then seeking to have a
relationship recognised as a marriage makes sense.
But what if I reject religion, and specifically the Christian version of such? What, if in that rejection I see Chrisianity as inhibiting and repressive, putting silly, stupid restrictions on human freedom?
What then is my rationale basis for a monagomous relationship?
But what if I reject religion, and specifically the Christian version of such? What, if in that rejection I see Chrisianity as inhibiting and repressive, putting silly, stupid restrictions on human freedom?
What then is my rationale basis for a monagomous relationship?
When I look at both the world of humans and the larger world of living
things, monagomy seems a rare, unusual sort of thing. There are few
animal species that mate for life. And in the human sphere, monagomy
seems to be something that largely evolved in the Christian world.
Polygamy was allowed, and in one place even commanded, in the Old
Testament and seems to be the norm in other cultures.
So, if the only basis for monagomous marriage is Christianity, then why would those who reject Christianity clamour for the right to relationship that appears only to have any basis in that which they reject?
So, if the only basis for monagomous marriage is Christianity, then why would those who reject Christianity clamour for the right to relationship that appears only to have any basis in that which they reject?
Sunday, June 1, 2014
Iraq - a 'well-rooted country'
Iraq means 'well-rooted country'. It came into being as a result of a decision by Winston Churchill in 1921.
Arabs are not one homogeneous bunch - they hate each other with a vengeance. But the Ottomans had held their empire together for a few centuries by recognising the different groups and organising them into some form of autonomous regions.
The Ottoman Empire crumbled with the end of WW1, leaving the area to some extent under the influence of the Britts - but there was not support in England for a continuation of the Empire. Against all advice from his advisors Churchill drew lines on a map and divided the area into different countries without regard for ethnic tensions. He then handed power over to local strong-men who he believed would look after England's interests - forget democracy.
And part of that legacy is modern Iraq, a mix of Sunnis, Shites and Kurds - a 'well-rooted country'.
(History's worst decisions and the people who made them, Steven Weir, p.p. 134, 135)
Arabs are not one homogeneous bunch - they hate each other with a vengeance. But the Ottomans had held their empire together for a few centuries by recognising the different groups and organising them into some form of autonomous regions.
The Ottoman Empire crumbled with the end of WW1, leaving the area to some extent under the influence of the Britts - but there was not support in England for a continuation of the Empire. Against all advice from his advisors Churchill drew lines on a map and divided the area into different countries without regard for ethnic tensions. He then handed power over to local strong-men who he believed would look after England's interests - forget democracy.
And part of that legacy is modern Iraq, a mix of Sunnis, Shites and Kurds - a 'well-rooted country'.
(History's worst decisions and the people who made them, Steven Weir, p.p. 134, 135)
Sunday, May 25, 2014
There is no free education
There never has been, nor never will be, free education in this country. Whether your education has been private or public I and every other tax payer have paid for it. And if you have accrued a HECS debt at uni - your education has still been subsidised by the tax payer.
As someone who has contributed to your education I expect you to give something back to the community. That means, if you are able to, get a job. It also means if that education has given you opportunites that others haven't had and you now find yourself earning an income that may be the envy of others you recognise that not everyone has had your opportunity, or that they have made their equally, if not more, valuble contribution to the welfare of our community in ways that have not brought them the same financial reward. So don't complain if you are asked to make a contribution above what you may or may not give through your employment.
As someone who has contributed to your education I expect you to give something back to the community. That means, if you are able to, get a job. It also means if that education has given you opportunites that others haven't had and you now find yourself earning an income that may be the envy of others you recognise that not everyone has had your opportunity, or that they have made their equally, if not more, valuble contribution to the welfare of our community in ways that have not brought them the same financial reward. So don't complain if you are asked to make a contribution above what you may or may not give through your employment.
Saturday, May 24, 2014
Random Stuff
If we support and endorse a predatory economic model should we then complain when it chews us up and spits us out?
What if we valued work according to what it contributed to the betterment of the community?
The power of an idea, philosophy or belief is seen in the willingness of people to embrace and hold onto it freely without inducement, fear or force.
The first role of government and our elected representatives should always be to maintain the social cohesivenss of the nation.
It should be to this purpose that they frame their policies and their debates.
To the extent that they fail on this point they fail the people and on this point they should be judged first and foremost.
Frustration
One thing I have learned from Karate is this. Frustration, if understood and managed the right way, is good.
When I try to learn something new after a while I get frustrated with my efforts. Frustration tells me that my brain now knows that I could be doing it better but my abiity does not match my ideal. It is a natural part of learning, necessary if I am to improve.
And right now I find this world and this country frustrating. Ideals, like perfect karate technique are something to be pursued, but will always remain unattainable. But to stop trying is to accept mediocracy.
When I try to learn something new after a while I get frustrated with my efforts. Frustration tells me that my brain now knows that I could be doing it better but my abiity does not match my ideal. It is a natural part of learning, necessary if I am to improve.
And right now I find this world and this country frustrating. Ideals, like perfect karate technique are something to be pursued, but will always remain unattainable. But to stop trying is to accept mediocracy.
The Wisdom of the Ages
There
was once an Emperor who wanted to leave something for posterity. So he
called his sages together and said; 'Gentlemen, I want you to write down
the wisdom of the ages.'
Away they went and applied themselves diligently to the task. The weeks and months passed and finally they returned with the sense of satisfaction that can only come from a job well done.
'Your majesty', they said, 'it is with great pleasure that we present you with the wisdom of the ages'. And with that they handed him ten beautifully bound volumes.
The Emperor took one look at their finished work and exclaimed 'Gentlemen, this will never do. No one will ever take the time to read all that. You need to do better.'
So away they went. Again the weeks turned into months and finally the sages returned. 'Here it is you majesty', they said. And with that they handed over one beautifully bound volume.
'Gentlemen', the Emperor returned. 'Your work is still too long for no one will take the time to read it. Go away and make it shorter.'
So off they went again. They worked and worked, long into the nights. Finally, they felt they had achieved what the Emperor wanted so they approached him again.
This time the Emperor was satisfied with their efforts. 'Gentlemen, you have excelled yourselves. Surely, you have discovered the wisdom of the ages.'
And with that he took from them a single sheet of paper on which were the words 'There ain't no free lunch.'
Away they went and applied themselves diligently to the task. The weeks and months passed and finally they returned with the sense of satisfaction that can only come from a job well done.
'Your majesty', they said, 'it is with great pleasure that we present you with the wisdom of the ages'. And with that they handed him ten beautifully bound volumes.
The Emperor took one look at their finished work and exclaimed 'Gentlemen, this will never do. No one will ever take the time to read all that. You need to do better.'
So away they went. Again the weeks turned into months and finally the sages returned. 'Here it is you majesty', they said. And with that they handed over one beautifully bound volume.
'Gentlemen', the Emperor returned. 'Your work is still too long for no one will take the time to read it. Go away and make it shorter.'
So off they went again. They worked and worked, long into the nights. Finally, they felt they had achieved what the Emperor wanted so they approached him again.
This time the Emperor was satisfied with their efforts. 'Gentlemen, you have excelled yourselves. Surely, you have discovered the wisdom of the ages.'
And with that he took from them a single sheet of paper on which were the words 'There ain't no free lunch.'
Anonymous
The Story
For as long as humans have walked the planet is the story. We
each have our own story, yet we share the story. It is passed down from
generation to generation, forever changing yet remaining constant. It presents
us with our highest ideals and confronts us with the dark side of our being.
The story has always entertained us. Throughout our history
it has defined us, helped us understand who we are in relation to others, and
passed on values and the knowledge we have needed to survive.
It is ours to decide what we do with the story we inherit.
The story we receive is the amalgamation of many stories, that of our parents
and their parents, our community, our nation and more. We can accept it as
read, or take from it that which is good and discard the bad. We can also add
to it by taking from the stories of others. If we are wise we will recognise
the good in their stories and understand how we can weave that into the story
we leave our children.
Our land has an ancient story, the story of the Dreamtime.
It has been passed on in dance and painting and narrated around the campfire
from ancient time. Most of us know little if anything of this story, for we
have a different one. The majority story is still one of Anglo Celtic origin. Informed
by our Christian heritage it has shaped our laws, values and attitudes. We have
made it uniquely ours with tales of convicts, squatters, bushrangers, suicidal
swaggies, miners and soldiers. Since the end of World War Two especially people
have come to our shores from other places. Europe, Asia, Africa – indeed, in
the words of the song ‘from all the lands we’ve come.’ Their story is not of
depression – at least in this land – squatters, ANZAC, Eureka, shearers’ strikes
and bushrangers. They are Hindu, Moslem, Buddhist and Orthodox. They bring different
values, attitudes, and ways of understanding. The story is fragmenting,
changing.
Today the story is all around us. It is on our plasma
screens, IPhones, tablets and movie screens. It beckons to us from the book
shops and newsagents. We can fill our minds with the latest gossip about our
celebrities of choice or the latest conquests of our sporting heroes. Never
before has the human race had such an abundance of story. But do we ever stop
to reflect on, discuss, analyse and understand it. Is it simply entertainment,
or does it still shape who we are, how we think, and what is important to us?
Does it still help us to survive?
If we lose the story we lose who we are. We have no
meaningful legacy to leave our children and their children. We leave them
wandering confused, without meaning, and devoid of lasting values.
The future of our nation and that of our children belongs to
them, not to us. Ours it to pass on the story that will help them determine the
values they will live by, that will help them to survive, to give them their identity
and place in the world. We fail them if we do not do this.
If we are to bequeath them a worthwhile legacy we must
understand our story. We must listen to the stories of those who have come to
this land from the different nations of the world. If we can add to our story
the good that others offer and discard the dross that permeates all stories we
can help our children build a strong and united nation. The alternative is
division, insecurity and meaningless and all that comes with that.
The future may not be ours, but it is ours to shape.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
When CSR Screwed my Parents
Sugar cane came to the Lower Clarence early in the period of
White Settlement. My great-great-grandfather John Marsh built the first sugar
mill on Palmers Channel. The mill has long passed into history with milling for
the district being based on Harwood Island for as long as I remember.
Sugar is part of my family history. It was an important part
of my parents’ farm economy, as it was and continues to be to communities on
the Clarence, Richmond and Tweed rivers of Northern NSW. Each river has its own
sugar mill, and these were owned and operated by the Colonial Sugar Refinery
(CSR) until in what could only be described as an act of bastardry they abandoned
the sugar industry on the Northern Rivers in the 1970s. Closure of the three mills would
have devastated these communities.
CSR diversified into asbestos mining in 1948, operating
mines at Winttenoom, WA, that exposed workers and others to asbestos levels
thousands of times above that allowed by regulation at the time. In a 1988
court ruling against them the ‘judged ruled that CSR acted with 'continuing,
conscious and contumelious' disregard for its workers' safety …’ (Wikepedia). I
will leave you to draw your own conclusions about this company and its
morality.
The communities of the Northern Rivers owe Don
Day, the member for first Casino and later the Clarence, in the Wran Labor
Government of the day an enormous debt. Don, who married Dad’s Cousin
Marie Davis, took on CSR and saved the industry. With his leadership the
farmers formed a cooperative that now runs the three mills – The New South Wales Sugar Milling
Cooperative.
![]() |
| Sugar harversting on my parents' farm |
There is something appealing in the idea of cooperatives.
Companies like CSR exist solely for the benefit of their shareholders who may
have no interest whatsoever in the community in which the business operates.
The communities of the Northern Rivers were obviously only economic units that
could be chewed up and spat out when their usefulness to the company ceased.
Cooperatives on the other hand exist for the benefit of their members. In the
case of the NSW Sugar Milling Cooperative, they are based in the local
community that they rely on and service.
We have been holidaying in the Macksville region for over 10
years. Until the last couple of years the main supermarket in town has been
operated by the Nambucca River Co-operative
Society, which also operates a clothing store and service station.
Woolworths has recently moved into the area which has bought some competition
but we continue to do most of our shopping in the well-stocked co-op store.
I have done virtually no research on the topic. Like all
things human the concept will have its flaws. But I do believe we need to look
for alternatives to the prevailing economic model that sees distant
shareholders with no real interest in local communities that are able to use
then as pawns in the quest for ever increasing profits.
And if you want an alternative to CSR, buy Sunshine Sugar, fully Australian owned and the profits go directly back to the local community.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
